Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The performance achieved can be found at the following confluence page:
https://confluence.arm.com/display/MLENG/GEMM-based+convolution+vs+Winograd-based+convolution+on+OpenCL
Change-Id: I4b690cfdd4eb4ff0cd17b14fdd49ccaa1d1dc85c
Reviewed-on: https://eu-gerrit-1.euhpc.arm.com/127729
Tested-by: Jenkins <bsgcomp@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Georgios Pinitas <georgios.pinitas@arm.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I0b126f03028f08687497b0d79d2e2764f7ed07c8
Reviewed-on: https://eu-gerrit-1.euhpc.arm.com/128001
Tested-by: Jenkins <bsgcomp@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Anthony Barbier <anthony.barbier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gian Marco Iodice <gianmarco.iodice@arm.com>
|
|
COMPMID-1014 - Refactoring Winograd's dataset
Change-Id: I6abdcbf9a90d663f4db666cd410afece9f1d034d
Reviewed-on: https://eu-gerrit-1.euhpc.arm.com/125899
Tested-by: Jenkins <bsgcomp@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Anthony Barbier <anthony.barbier@arm.com>
|
|
Implemented Winograd Output Transform (2x2,3x3) on OpenCL
Implemented CLWinogradConvolutionLayer on OpenCL
Change-Id: I6a113fc5f052ca07f878d2b800d2ab003f84af65
Reviewed-on: https://eu-gerrit-1.euhpc.arm.com/125148
Reviewed-by: Georgios Pinitas <georgios.pinitas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins <bsgcomp@arm.com>
|